Farr

Farr v. U.S. West Communications, Inc.

Good Law
179 F.3d 1252·1999 WL 496479·1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 38877
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 15, 1999No. 96-36051California111 words

Lead Opinion

ORDER

The Opinion appearing at 151 F.3d 908 (9th Cir.1998), is amended as follows:

Page 915, second column, second full paragraph, lines 9-10: substitute “backpay and reinstatement or front pay” for “reinstatement with back and front pay.”

Page 916, second column, second full paragraph, lines 1-2: substitute “Plaintiffs also seek back pay and reinstatement or front pay until normal retirement age” for “Plaintiffs also seek reinstatement with back and front pay.”

Page 916, second column, second full paragraph, lines 15-16: insert footnote call “7” following “That conclusion, in turn, renders Plaintiffs’ request for front and back pay moot.” On same page insert corresponding footnote as follows:

Judge Fernandez does not join.