Baria

Baria v. Reno

Good Law
180 F.3d 1111·99 Daily Journal DAR 6695·1999 WL 435811·1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 14880·99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5226
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 30, 1999No. 98-16034California1,406 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Noonan, J.

Rodolfo Monroy Baria appeals the judgment of the district court affirming the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (the Board) to rescind his status as a lawful permanent resident. We affirm the judgment of the district court, publishing this opinion in order to clarify the relationship between a motion to reopen before the Board and the jurisdiction of the district court.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Baria, a native and citizen of the Philippines and a traveling musician, entered the United States in June 1984 as a visitor authorized to remain until June 13, 1985. Two months after his arrival, he filed for divorce in Nevada. In December 1984 he began living in Hawaii with a United States citizen, Bibiana Patoc. Two weeks after his divorce became final, he married her; it was a day after the expiration of his visitor’s visa. On September 20, 1985 on Bibiana’s application, his status was adjusted to that of a lawful permanent resident.

A little over a year later, in November 1986, the couple separated. Bibiana contacted the Immigration and Naturalization Service (the Service). On January 28, 1988, the Service issued a notice of intent to rescind Baria’s adjusted status because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.