Curtis-Locicero v. Gannett Outdoor Co., Inc., of Southern California

70 F.3d 119 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Denise CURTIS-LOCICERO; Shin Chong Yong, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GANNETT OUTDOOR COMPANY, INC., of Southern California; Local Union # 831, Sign, Scene, Pictorial Painters, Display And Decorators I.B.P.A.T. AFL-CIO, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-56114. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 7, 1995. * Decided Aug. 15, 1995. Before: THOMPSON, LEAVY, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Denise Curtis-Locicero and Shin Chong Yong appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Gannett Outdoor Company, Inc. ("Gannett") and Local Union 831, Sign, Scene, Pictorial Painters, and Display Decorators ("Local 831"), in Ms. Locicero and Mr. Shin's lawsuit alleging various employment related claims in connection with Gannett's implementation of a work force reduction. Ms. Locicero maintains that Gannett's decision to terminate her employment was the result of sex discrimination…