F.T.C. v. Wells

70 F.3d 119 1995-2 Trade Cases P 71,203 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Norman WELLS, a/k/a Johnny Norman Wells, John Holmes, and Duke Wells; individually and as an officer of; Pacific Medical Clinics Management, Inc., a corporation, Defendants-Appellants. No. 95-55053. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 6, 1995. * Decided Nov. 9, 1995. Before: GOODWIN, PREGERSON, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 James Norman Wells appeals pro se the district court's orders (1) granting the Federal Trade Commission's ("FTC") motion for an order releasing monies from Wells's frozen bank accounts and turning the money over to the FTC in partial satisfaction of the FTC's judgment against Wells; (2) denying Wells's motion for recusal; (3) denying Wells's motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis; and (4) denying Wells's motion for appointment of counsel. 3 We have jurisdiction…