Local 159, 342, 343 & 444 v. Nor-Cal Plumbing, Inc.

Good Law
185 F.3d 978·99 Daily Journal DAR 7543·1999 WL 536690·161 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3077·23 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2988
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 27, 1999Nos. 96-16172, 96-16284California3,587 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tashima, J.

Nor-Cal Plumbing, Inc. (“Nor-Cal”), a plumbing contracting business, was a signatory to a collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”) with Local 343 of the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefit-ting Industry (the “Union”). The CBA incorporated a Trust Agreement obligating Nor-Cal to make pension and welfare benefit contributions to employee benefit plans (the “Trust Funds”) 1 based on the number of hours worked by Nor-Cal’s employees.

The owner and manager of Nor-Cal, Elmar Pettit, began “double-breasting” when he opened a non-union plumbing business, North Bay Plumbing, Inc. (“North Bay”), while still maintaining Nor-Cal, which was unionized. He started transferring work from Nor-Cal to North Bay, until Nor-Cal finally stopped bidding on jobs altogether and shut down its operations in 1987.

The Trust Funds sued Nor-Cal, North Bay, Pettit and his wife Audrey Pettit (collectively the “Employers”), on the theory that the CBA covered North Bay employees because North Bay was the alter ego of Nor-Cal. The suit primarily sought to recover contributions for hours worked by North Bay employees. A jury found that Nor-Cal and North Bay were alter egos…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.