Michelle R. Hernandez v. City of San Carlos Owen McQuigan Clifford Gerst Peter Nannarone James Miller John Marshall Richard Cinfio

Good Law
70 F.3d 119·1995 WL 669231·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 37933
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 9, 199594-17105California954 words

Opinion

Opinion

70 F.3d 119 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michelle R. HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN CARLOS; Owen McQuigan; Clifford Gerst; Peter Nannarone; James Miller; John Marshall; Richard Cinfio, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-17105. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 6, 1995. * Decided Nov. 9, 1995. Before: GOODWIN, PREGERSON, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michelle R. Hernandez appeals the district court's denial of her Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to vacate the order dismissing her action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Secs. 2000e et seq., the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1981 , 1983 and 1985, and state law, for failure to comply with a district court order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we reverse and remand. 3 * Background 4 On February 1, 1994, Hernandez filed a complaint and request to proceed in forma…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.