Gregory Duane v. Hughes Aircraft Company

70 F.3d 119 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gregory DUANE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-56662. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 6, 1995. * Decided Nov. 9, 1995. Before: GOODWIN, PREGERSON, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Gregory Duane, who was represented by counsel in the district court, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendant Hughes Aircraft Company on his federal claims of race discrimination and on his false inducement claim brought under Cal.Lab.Code Sec. 970. Duane also appeals the district court's dismissal with prejudice of his state law implied-contract claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 3 After a careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court's grant of summary judgment for defendants on Duane's federal race discrimination claim and state-law false inducement claim was…