Sherry Nilson v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

70 F.3d 120 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Sherry NILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ** Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-35628. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 18, 1995. * Decided Nov. 6, 1995. Before: REINHARDT, and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER, District Judge. *** MEMORANDUM d Overview The issue in this case is whether substantial evidence in the record supports the Commissioner's final administrative decision that plaintiff, Sherry Nilson, was not entitled to social security disability benefits under 42 U.S.C. Secs. 401-33 . Nilson appeals from the district court's order granting the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment and denying her motion for summary judgment. 1 We reverse and remand for further consideration by the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) principally because he did not set forth sufficient reasons to reject the latest opinion of Dr. Dorr,…