Chaker Suidan v. County of San Diego Superior Court of California County of San Diego Kenneth E. Martone

70 F.3d 120 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Chaker SUIDAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; Superior Court of California County of San Diego; Kenneth E. Martone, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-56357. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 8, 1995. Decided Nov. 6, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Chaker Suidan appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants on his action under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 . Suidan alleges he was wrongfully terminated in violation of his rights to due process and equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment. Suidan further alleges that his termination violated the controlling state statute as well as an implied contract and a covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Finally, Suidan alleges his entitlement to indemnification for costs he incurred defending a criminal action brought against him. We…