Kiliona v. State of Hawai"i
Opinion
Opinion
70 F.3d 120 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ku'ulei A. KILIONA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF HAWAII, et al., Defendants, and Protection and Advocacy Agency of Hawaii; Kaihe Akahane; Gary Smith, (collectively referred to as the "PAA Defendants"). Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15401. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 7, 1995. * Decided Nov. 13, 1995. Before: HUG, THOMPSON, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Plaintiff Ku'ulei Kiliona appeals pro se the district court's dismissal with prejudice of her federal complaint against numerous defendants and the imposition of Rule 11 sanctions against her. The claim arose out of plaintiff's dissatisfaction with the outcome of her workers' compensation claim. In her federal complaint, she alleged, inter alia, that the various defendants conspired against her to deprive her of her constitutional and statutory rights, alleging violations based on 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 , Title…