Jose Danilo Polanco-Cuadra Rosa Melania Jimenez-Castillo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
70 F.3d 120·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 37855
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 3, 199595-70105California747 words

Opinion

Opinion

70 F.3d 120 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jose Danilo POLANCO-CUADRA; Rosa Melania Jimenez-Castillo, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 95-70105. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 24, 1995. * Decided Nov. 3, 1995. Before: BEEZER, THOMPSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jose Danilo Polanco-Cuadra and Rosa Melania Jimenez-Castillo, natives and citizens of Nicaragua and common-law husband and wife, petition for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (the "BIA") affirming the Immigration Judge's (the "IJ") denial of their requests for asylum and withholding of deportation under sections 208(a) and 243(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. Secs. 1158 (a), 1253(h). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a) and deny the petition for review. 3 We review for abuse of discretion a denial of asylum, Abedini v. INS, 971 F.2d 188, 191…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.