Sadri v. Spectrum Properties Inc.

70 F.3d 120 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Asghar R. SADRI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SPECTRUM PROPERTIES INCORPORATED, an Oregon corporation; CB Commercial Real Estate Group, Inc., a California corporation; Donald Maltase, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35423. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 20, 1995. Decided Nov. 3, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, D.W. NELSON and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 1 Sadri appeals from a summary judgment in favor of CB Commercial Real Estate Group, Inc. and Donald Maltase (collectively referred to as Maltase). The district court held that no genuine issue of fact exists with respect to any of Sadri's claims. The district court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1332 . We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 2 A district court's entry of summary judgment is reviewed de novo. Warren v. City of Carlsbad, 58 F.3d 439, 441 (9th…