In re Pathfinder III
Opinion
Opinion
70 F.3d 120 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re PATHFINDER III, a California Limited Partnership, Debtor and Debtor in, Possession. MARTIN/BRATTRUD PROPERTIES, a California general partnership; Robert L. Brattrud, Appellants, v. PATHFINDER III, a California general partnership; Pathfinder IV, a California limited partnership; Imperial Bank; the Great-West Life Assurance Company; Pacific Newport Properties, a California corporation; William R. Patton, Esq.; Marshall P. Wilkinson; Sandra K. Dilgard; Melinda D. Patton; Donald Minkoff, Appellees. No. 95-55267. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 6, 1995. * Decided Nov. 9, 1995. Before: GOODWIN, PREGERSON, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Martin/Brattrud Properties and Robert L. Brattrud (collectively "Martin/Brattrud") appeal the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's ("BAP") affirmance of the bankruptcy court's order granting debtors Pathfinder III's and Pathfinder IV's…