In re Pathfinder III

Good Law
70 F.3d 120·1995 WL 669556·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 37922
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 9, 199595-55267California612 words

Opinion

Opinion

70 F.3d 120 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re PATHFINDER III, a California Limited Partnership, Debtor and Debtor in, Possession. MARTIN/BRATTRUD PROPERTIES, a California general partnership; Robert L. Brattrud, Appellants, v. PATHFINDER III, a California general partnership; Pathfinder IV, a California limited partnership; Imperial Bank; the Great-West Life Assurance Company; Pacific Newport Properties, a California corporation; William R. Patton, Esq.; Marshall P. Wilkinson; Sandra K. Dilgard; Melinda D. Patton; Donald Minkoff, Appellees. No. 95-55267. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 6, 1995. * Decided Nov. 9, 1995. Before: GOODWIN, PREGERSON, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Martin/Brattrud Properties and Robert L. Brattrud (collectively "Martin/Brattrud") appeal the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's ("BAP") affirmance of the bankruptcy court's order granting debtors Pathfinder III's and Pathfinder IV's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.