Miguel Angel Salaverry Alcazar v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
70 F.3d 120·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 37858
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 3, 199595-70256California702 words

Opinion

Opinion

70 F.3d 120 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Miguel Angel Salaverry ALCAZAR, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 95-70256. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 24, 1995. * Decided Nov. 3, 1995. Before: BEEZER, THOMPSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Miguel Angel Salaverry Alcazar, a native and citizen of Peru, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' summary dismissal of his appeal from an immigration judge's decision finding him deportable as charged. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a), and we deny the petition for review. BACKGROUND 3 On December 20, 1994, Salaverry filed a pro se Notice of Appeal (Form EOIR-26) with the BIA, stating that his family would suffer hardship if he were deported and that his parents needed him to transport them to medical appointments. He indicated that he would not be filing a separate brief with the BIA and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.