Kaza v. Allen

Good Law
70 F.3d 120·1995 WL 655163·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 37925
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 7, 199594-16539California2,688 words

Opinion

Opinion

70 F.3d 120 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John KAZA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Toni ALLEN; Robert Eiriksson; Arthur Danner; Dennis Smith; Tom Gilbertson; Don Bradley; Richard Kessel, Robert Tanner; Alfred F. Noren; Bruce Simpson; Bradley Arbsland; George Foster; and Santa Cruz County, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16539. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 24, 1995. * Decided Nov. 7, 1995. Before: BEEZER, THOMPSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John Kaza appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1981 , 1983 and 1985 actions. He contends that his civil rights were violated when he was arrested without a warrant or probable cause and by various incidents during his 28-day incarceration. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . 1 We affirm in part, and reverse and remand in part. I. BACKGROUND 3 In July 1988, Municipal Court Judge Richard Kessell received…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.