United States v. Larry P. Ledford

70 F.3d 121 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry P. LEDFORD, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-15459. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 6, 1995. * Decided Nov. 9, 1995. Before: GOODWIN, PREGERSON, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Larry P. Ledford, a federal parolee, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion. He contends the district court erred in denying him relief. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 . We accept the district court's factual findings unless clearly erroneous and review its conclusions of law de novo. Doganiere v. United States, 914 F.2d 165, 167 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 940 (1991). We affirm. 3 On June 8, 1984, Ledford pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute marijuana and was sentenced to five years in prison consecutive to another federal conviction. At his sentencing…