Sumpton

Avery Dennison Corp. v. Sumpton

Good Law
189 F.3d 868·1999 WL 637085
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 23, 1999No. 98-55810California5,922 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Trott, J.

Jerry Sumpton and Freeview Listings Ltd. (together, “Appellants”) appeal an injunction in favor of Avery Dennison Corp., entered after summary judgment for Avery Dennison on its claims of trademark dilution under the Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995, 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (c) (Supp. II 1996) (amending the Lanham Trademark Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051-1127 (1994)), and the California dilution statute, Cal. Bus. & Prof.Code § 14330 (West 1987). The district court published an opinion, 999 F.Supp. 1337 (C.D.Cal.1998), holding that Appellants’ maintenance of domain name registrations for and diluted two of Avery Dennison’s separate trademarks, “Avery” and “Dennison.” (Note that when referencing Internet addresses, domain-name combinations, e-mail addresses, and other Internet-related character strings, we use the caret symbols (“< > ”), in order to avoid possible confusion.) The district court then entered an injunction ordering Appellants to transfer the domain-name registrations to Avery Dennison in exchange for $300 each.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994). Because Avery Dennison failed to create a genuine issue of fact on required…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.