United States v. Paris Maxwell, United States of America v. William Henry Lee, United States of America v. Sabrina Lee, United States of America v. Lorenzo McCray

70 F.3d 121 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paris MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Henry LEE, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sabrina LEE, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lorenzo McCRAY, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 94-10318, 94-10433, 94-10439 and 94-10454. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 27, 1995. * Decided Nov. 6, 1995. 1 Before: CHOY, SKOPIL, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Defendants Sabrina Lee, William Lee, and Lorenzo McCray appeal their convictions for conspiracy and possession of cocaine. Defendant Paris Maxwell pleaded guilty but challenges the voluntariness of his plea and the district court's imposition of sentence. A fifth defendant, Steve Martin, pleaded guilty and testified against the other defendants at trial. 4 William…