United States v. Shawn Eric Forsberg

70 F.3d 121 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shawn Eric FORSBERG, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50074. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 19, 1995. Decided Nov. 3, 1995. 1 Before: HUG, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and JONES, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 The issue presented in this appeal is whether the district court properly sentenced defendant for offenses charged in separate indictments under the Sentencing Guidelines. 4 Defendant appeals his sentence after pleading guilty to two bank robberies committed in different districts. STANDARD OF REVIEW 5 The district court's interpretation and application of the Sentencing Guidelines are reviewed de novo. United States v. Basinger, 60 F.3d 1400, 1409 (9th Cir.1995). DISCUSSION 6 In January 1993, the government filed a one-count indictment against defendant in the District of Arizona, charging him with bank robbery. The…