United States v. Bobby Mitchell Baker

70 F.3d 121 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bobby Mitchell BAKER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10516. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 18, 1995. Decided Nov. 13, 1995. Before: GOODWIN and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges and FITZGERALD * , District Judge. MEMORANDUM 1 Bobby Baker appeals his sentence of 175 months imposed as a career criminal following a guilty plea to violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a) (bank robbery). His prior convictions, for guideline sentencing purposes, included robbing one bank in San Diego, and one bank in Las Vegas eight days later, in 1984. Baker contends that the district court erred by treating his two prior bank robbery convictions as unrelated offenses and thus misapplied U.S.S.G. Sec. 4A1.2(a)(2) (1994). We affirm the judgment. A defendant is a career offender if he has at least two prior, unrelated felony convictions of either a crime of…