United States v. Daniel M. Longoria, Jr.

70 F.3d 121 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel M. LONGORIA, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-35320. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 6, 1995. * Decided Nov. 9, 1995. Before: GOODWIN, PREGERSON, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Daniel M. Longoria, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his second 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion. He contends the district court erred in denying him relief. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 . We review de novo the denial of a section 2255 motion. United States v. Moore, 921 F.2d 207, 209 (9th Cir.1990). We affirm. 3 Longoria pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and distribution of cocaine. The district court sentenced him to 188 months in prison. Less than three weeks after filing his notice of appeal, Longoria signed a motion to dismiss his appeal. This court subsequently…