Johnathan M. Warbis v. Kay Walter

70 F.3d 122 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Johnathan M. WARBIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Kay WALTER, Respondent-Appellee. No. 95-35204. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 24, 1995. * Decided Nov. 3, 1995. Before: BEEZER, THOMPSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jonathan M. Warbis, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas petition alleging that prison officials erroneously found him guilty of several disciplinary infractions involving the trafficking of controlled substances within the prison. As a result of the guilty findings, Warbis was sanctioned with a loss of 540 days of good-time credit and ten days confinement in isolation. Warbis contends that the guilty findings were not supported by the evidence and that he did not understand his rights in connection with the prison disciplinary hearing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Secs.…