Norris

Norris v. Sysco Corp.

Good Law
191 F.3d 1043·1999 WL 710354
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 14, 1999Nos. 97-15404, 97-15447, 97-16716California4,564 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fernandez, J.

Brenda Norris brought this action against Allied-Sysco Food Services, Inc. She alleged that, among other things, she had been subjected to discrimination in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000e-15, and the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 . After the jury rendered a verdict with special interrogatories, the district court entered judgment against Allied. Allied now appeals on grounds that the district court erred in failing to grant it judgment as a matter of law or a new trial, 1 and also erroneously granted attorney’s fees against it. For her part, Norris appeals the district court’s decision to exclude certain evidence. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

Norris was employed by Allied as a non-foods specialist. That was a traveling sales position in which she was required to assist Allied’s marketing associates in selling food related supplies and equipment, a job that necessitated driving long distances and occasionally lifting and moving heavy objects.

Working for Allied was never a picnic because the company did engage in practices that unlawfully discriminated against women, or at least the Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.