Leslie Warner v. Linda Roberts Misty Andrae Lee Hotchkins Mills Lane

70 F.3d 122 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Leslie WARNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Linda ROBERTS; Misty Andrae; Lee Hotchkins; Mills Lane, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16277. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 6, 1995. * Decided Nov. 9, 1995. Before: GOODWIN, PREGERSON, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Nevada state prisoner Leslie Warner appeals pro se the district court's dismissal as frivolous of his civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 alleging that his common-law wife and her daughter, together with Nevada state court Judge Mills Lane and Warner's private attorneys, conspired to obtain a default judgment resulting in the loss of Warner's property. We agree with the district court that Warner's amended complaint lacks an arguable basis in fact or law and further amendment would not create a cognizable federal constitutional claim under section 1983 because Judge Lane is entitled to absolute judicial…