King

State of Montana Department of Transportation v. King

Good Law
191 F.3d 1108·99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7454
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 9, 1999No. 98-35002California2,996 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Thomas, J.

In this appeal, we are required to decide whether the Fort Belknap Indian Community (the “Community”) can regulate the State of Montana’s employment practices in performing construction work on a state highway that crosses the reservation. We conclude that the Community lacks the power and jurisdiction to enforce their employment ordinance against the State of Montana for work done on a state-owned right of way and thus affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment.

I

The Fort Belknap Indian Community (“Community”) is a federally recognized Indian community comprised of the Gros Ventre and Assiniboine Tribes. Their reservation is located in north-central Mon *1111 tana, covering an area approximately twenty-eight miles wide from east to west and forty miles in length from north to south. Poverty stalks the reservation. Approximately 70% of the Community members are unemployed; of those fortunate enough to have a job, over 40% live below federal poverty guidelines.

To address the lack of employment opportunities, the Fort Belknap Indian Community Council enacted an affirmative action policy, called the Tribal Employment Rights Ordinance (“TERO”). The TERO regulates the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.