Lindsey

Lindsey v. Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department

Good Law
195 F.3d 1065
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 19, 1999No. 98-35416California5,146 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Brunetti, J.

In 1996, the Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department Board of Health adopted a resolution that bans outdoor tobacco advertising within Pierce County, Washington. The Board adopted the ban in an attempt to reduce underage tobacco use in the county. The Lindseys, owners of convenience stores who are licensed to sell tobacco products in the State of Washington, filed this action against the Board of Health and other defendants alleging that the Board’s resolution was (1) an unconstitutional regulation of commercial speech under the First Amendment; (2) preempted by the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act; (3) preempted by the Washington Tobacco Access to Minors Act; and (4) beyond the Board’s statutory authority. The district court granted the Board’s motion for summary judgment and entered a judgment in its favor. The Lindseys appeal from the district court’s final judgment in favor of the Board. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and reverse because a local ban on outdoor tobacco advertising is preempted by the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act.

I.

James Lindsey and Sun Cha Lindsey-plaintiffs-appellants-are husband and wife and the owners of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.