Walczak

Walczak v. EPL Prolong, Inc.

Good Law
198 F.3d 725·1999 WL 1083971
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 3, 1999No. 99-55227California3,840 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Trott, J.

EPL Prolong, Inc., et al. (collectively “Appellants”) appeal an order of the district court granting a preliminary injunction in favor of appellee Michael Walczak (“Walczak”), an EPL Prolong, Inc. minority shareholder who is the representative in a class action shareholder derivative suit. Appellants argue that the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo, S.A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc., 527 U.S. 308 , 119 S.Ct. 1961 , 144 L.Ed.2d 319 (1999), warrants summary reversal of the district court’s preliminary injunction. Alternatively, Appellants contend that the district court erred in granting the preliminary injunction because Walczak failed to demonstrate: (1) a threat of irreparable injury; or (2) a likelihood of success on the merits. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a)(1), and we affirm the district court’s order issuing a preliminary injunction.

I

Background

EPL Prolong, Inc. (“EPL Prolong”), a California corporation, owns the patent for “Prolong Super Lubricant” (“PSL Patent”), which is a high performance metal lubricant used in automobiles as an additive to motor oil. In 1993, EPL Prolong entered into a license agreement (“1993…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.