Cline

Cline v. Industrial Maintenance Engineering & Contracting Co.

Good Law
200 F.3d 1223·2000 Daily Journal DAR 359·2000 WL 14445·23 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2628·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 243
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 11, 2000Nos. 98-16025, 98-16546, 98-16560, 98-16616California4,949 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Goodwin, J.

These consolidated appeals arise out of an attempted class action brought to impose ERISA status and liability upon an employee benefit plan which the defendants assert is an IRA plan not covered by Parts 2 and 3 of Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. The District Court granted summary judgments. The plaintiffs have appealed the judgments, and the defendants have appealed the denial of attorney fees. We affirm.

FACTS

On or about December 1, 1977, Appellee The Industrial Maintenance Engineering & Contracting Co. (“TIMEC”) and Appellee International Union of Petroleum & Industrial Workers (the “Union”) 1 created *1228 a group Individual Retirement Annuity (IRA) plan (the “Plan”) for the benefit of Union members who were employees of TIMEC. The Plan purchased a group IRA policy from Appellee Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company (“Great-West”). Another company, Appellee Oak Tree Administration, Inc. (“Oak Tree”) provides services to the Plan. At its inception the Plan was funded through employee contributions only. TIMEC, the Union, the Plan, Greab-West and Oak Tree are collectively the Defendants, Appellees and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.