Virgin

Virgin v. County of San Luis Obispo

Good Law
2000 Daily Journal DAR 487·201 F.3d 1141·2000 WL 19213·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 357·2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 394
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 13, 2000No. 98-55557California1,980 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

We affirm the district court’s dismissal because of a lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

*1142 Factual and Procedural Background

Edwin F. Virgin, Sr., Susan S. Virgin, and Edwin F. Virgin, Jr. own land in the County of San Luis Obispo because of federal land patents granted to their predecessors-in-interest. The Virgins appeal the district court’s dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction over their declaratory relief action against the county and others alleging that the county’s Subdivision Review Board improperly denied their application for a parcel lot line adjustment intended to create thirteen separate legal parcels out of the Virgins’ acreage. The Virgins argue that the district court erred because: (1) the general rule that a federal land patent does not confer federal question jurisdiction does not apply; (2) several Supreme Court precedents and/or the acts of Congress creating their federal patents provide exceptions to the general rule; and (3) the Supremacy Clause creates federal question jurisdiction.

The appellants claim ownership of about 1,240 acres in San Luis Obispo County. They allegedly own seven legal parcels created by patents issued to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.