Patterson
Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'n v. Patterson
203 F.3d 1175·2000 WL 190265
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 28, 2000No. 98-35708California109 words
Lead Opinion
ORDER
The opinion filed September 9, 1999, is amending by adding a new footnote 3 at the end of Part II.B.3, slip op. at 11169, 191 F.3d at 1123, as follows:
With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny appellants’ petition for panel rehearing. Judge Tashima votes to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judges B. Fletcher and Ferguson so recommend.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on en banc rehearing. Fed. R.App. P. 35(b).
The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are denied.