Bennett

Bennett v. King

Good Law
2000 Daily Journal DAR 2519·205 F.3d 1188·2000 WL 249112·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1834·2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 3424
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 7, 2000No. 97-15848California330 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

ORDER

Frederick Douglas Bennett is an inmate of the Pelican Bay State Prison of the State of California. In 1995 he began pro se a civil rights suit against the warden and nineteen other officers of the prison. The suit was filed in the Southern District of California. On December 4, 1996 it was dismissed to permit refiling in the proper venue, the Northern District of California. On February 12, 1997 the district court for the Northern District dismissed the complaint with leave to amend so as to allege only claims for which Bennett had exhausted his administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Bennett was allowed thirty days to amend.

On February 18, 1997 Bennett was charged by prison officials with breaking his cup in his cell, refusing to submit to restraints, breaking the sprinkler in his cell, and assaulting staff. He was removed to a “Cap Cell” where he was permitted a maximum of three pounds of personal property. Any legal work done by Bennett required special authorization by the facility lieutenant. His legal materials were boxed and removed from his possession.

As a result of these restrictions Bennett failed to amend his complaint in thirty days. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.