Self-Realization Fellowship Church v. Ananda Church of Self-Realization

Good Law
2000 Daily Journal DAR 3109·206 F.3d 1322·2000 WL 297404·54 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1173·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2295
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 23, 2000No. 97-17407California4,217 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Schroeder, J.

This litigation war between two rival churches concerns copyrights to the writings, photographs, and sound recordings of Swami Paramahansa Yogananda. The plaintiff, Self-Realization Fellowship Church (“SRF”), claims that it holds valid copyrights to all of the works. The defendants and admitted copiers are a breakaway church and its leader, Ananda Church of Self-Realization and James Walters (“Ananda”). They contend that none of the copyrights are valid.

The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Ananda. On appeal, SRF raises various issues. The most important are whether the works of a religious leader, living under a vow of poverty in the church he founded, can be considered “works for hire” or the works of a “corporate body” within the meaning of the 1909 Copyright Act and, in the alternative, whether SRF has adduced evidence from which a jury could conclude that a valid assignment of common law copyrights occurred.

With regard to Yogananda’s writings and spoken lectures, we hold that the works are not works for hire or the works of a corporate body, so that the common law copyrights did not vest in the church as a matter of law. We hold that there are triable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.