Rutledge
Rutledge v. Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather & Geraldson
208 F.3d 1170·2000 WL 347161
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 5, 2000No. 98-15298California101 words
Lead Opinion
ORDER
The Opinion filed January 12, 2000, slip op. 403 [ 201 F.3d 1212 ], is amended as follows:
With these amendments, the panel has voted unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge O’Scannlain and Judge Wardlaw have voted to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc and Judge Byrne so recommends.
The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing is DENIED and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is REJECTED.