Singh

Singh v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Bad Law
2000 Daily Journal DAR 5495·213 F.3d 1050·2000 WL 675138·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4098·2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 11620
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 25, 2000No. 98-70663California2,390 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wardlaw, J.

Balbir Singh (“Singh”) petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s denial, of his motion to reopen deportation proceedings held in absentia. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a (1996). 1 Because the BIA erred when it relied upon newly-created evidentiary standards in dismissing Singh’s appeal, we grant the petition.

I.

Singh, a 38-year-old native and citizen of India, entered the United States without inspection on August 8, 1993. On January 14, 1994, Singh filed an application for asylum claiming persecution based on religion, membership .in a particular social group, and political opinion. Singh'asserted he is “a devout follower of the Sikh faith” and an active member of the Akali Dal political party. Singh’s- declarations described numerous instances of violence and persecution by Indian police authorities and “anti-Sikh antagonists.” The asylum officer denied the asylum application. An order to show cause issued on February 8, 1996, alleging that Singh was de-portable. Singh was ordered to appear before an immigration judge on June 19, 1996.

Singh did not appear at his asylum…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.