Akiak Native Community v. United States Postal Service

Good Law
2000 Daily Journal DAR 5503·213 F.3d 1140·2000 WL 675124·30 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20632·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4092
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 25, 2000No. 98-35466California3,197 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Canby, J.

Plaintiffs, several Alaska Native communities, appeal from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of defendant, the United States Postal Service. Plaintiffs sought to enjoin the Postal Service’s Hovercraft Demonstration Project (“the Project”), an experimental program that delivers non-priority mail by surface hovercraft instead of by fixed-wing aircraft to eight remote Alaska Native villages on the Kus-kokwim River and two of its tributaries. Plaintiffs allege that the project violates the Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA), 16 U.S.C. § 1456 , and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. § 4332 .

Plaintiffs contend that the Project violates CZMA because it is inconsistent with Alaska’s coastal management program. Plaintiffs argue that the Project violates NEPA because the Postal Service’s final Environmental Assessment contains errors, omissions, and failures of analysis that invalidate its “Finding of No Significant Impact.”

Because we find no infirmities under either CZMA or NEPA, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

Background and Procedural History

In response to an unsolicited suggestion of a cheaper means of delivering parcel mail to specified…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.