Kennedy v. Southern California Edison Co.

Good Law
2000 Daily Journal DAR 8013·219 F.3d 988·30 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20761·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6049·2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 17373
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 20, 2000No. 98-56157California7,117 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hawkins, J.

This appeal requires us to examine California tort and products liability law as made specifically applicable to actions in federal court for claims of injury arising out of nuclear power plant incidents. Specifically, we must decide whether the district court erred in (1) refusing to give a jury instruction under Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal.4th 953 , 67 Cal.Rptr.2d 16 , 941 P.2d 1203 (1997), in a ease involving a single defendant who raises alternative possible sources of the injury as a defense; and (2) dismissing claims under California products liability law. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand the case for a new trial.

BACKGROUND

Ellen Kennedy died in 1996 of chronic myelogenous leukemia (“CML”), a rare form of cancer. She was 43 years old. The plaintiffs/appellants are her husband, Joe, and their four children (collectively referred to as “Kennedy”). From 1982 to 1990, Mr. Kennedy worked as machinist for Southern California Edison Company (“Cal Edison”) at the company’s San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (“SONGS”).

The plaintiffs sued Cal Edison in federal court, asserting jurisdiction pursuant to the Price-Anderson Act, 42 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.