Bennett

United States v. Bennett

Good Law
219 F.3d 1117·2000 WL 1035796
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 28, 2000Nos. 97-50605, 98-50002, 98-50070, 98-50209, 98-50212, 98-50514California3,831 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Thompson, J.

These consolidated appeals of defendants/appellants Daniel Ray Bennett, Edward Stanley, Victor Murillo, Rim Harris, Monica Renee Gant, and Richard Washington involve convictions resulting from an investigation of Stanley’s drug organization, headquartered in Los Angeles, California. Bennett and Stanley entered conditional guilty pleas to conspiracy to commit interstate murder-for-hire resulting in death, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1958 . Murillo and Harris entered conditional guilty pleas to possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). Gant entered a conditional guilty plea to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute heroin and cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 , and a jury convicted Washington of that same count.

All of the appellants challenge the district court’s denial of their motion to suppress wiretap evidence. 2 They allege that, in its wiretap application for the drug conspiracy investigation, the government failed to show necessity, failed to provide a separate necessity showing for its murder-for-hire investigation, provided an incomplete periodic wiretap report to the court, and failed to minimize the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.