95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8774, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15,237 United States of America v. Allan Bowlun Ing, United States of America v. Richard St. Clair

Good Law
70 F.3d 553
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 199594-10097California2,107 words

Opinion

Opinion

70 F.3d 553 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8774 , 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15,237 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Allan Bowlun ING, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard St. CLAIR, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 94-10097, 94-10149. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 14, 1995. * Argued and Submitted March 14, 1995. Submission Vacated June 5, 1995. Resubmitted Aug. 22, 1995. Decided Nov. 17, 1995. Philip H. Pennypacker, Siner, Steinbock, Hofmann & Pennypacker, San Jose, California, for defendant-appellant Allan Bowlun Ing. James W. Ramsaur, Chapuis & Ramsaur, Oakland, California, for defendant-appellant Richard St. Clair. Jeffrey Nedrow, Assistant United States Attorney, San Jose, California, for the plaintiff-appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before: FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: 1 Allan Bowlun Ing and Richard St. Clair were convicted of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and attempted possession with intent to distribute cocaine. Ing challenges his sentence on the ground that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.