Cramer
Cramer v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.
2000 Daily Journal DAR 10555·226 F.3d 1099·2000 WL 1429465·165 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2572·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7969
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 27, 2000No. 98-55657, 98-56041, 98-56154California67 words
Lead Opinion
Hug, J.
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it *1101 is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.