Irving LANCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee

Good Law
70 F.3d 1093·95 Daily Journal DAR 15597·1995 WL 694817·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 32818·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8912
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 27, 199594-56579California407 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lance was a volunteer worker at a Veterans Administration hospital. He was injured at the hospital and received treatment for the injury there. He’s now suing the government under the Federal Tort Claims Act for medical malpractice based on the treatment. As explained below, the Federal Employees Compensation Act preempts FTCA suits based on medical malpractice arising out of federal employees’ injuries at work. The district court therefore properly dismissed Lance’s FTCA suit.

FECA provides the exclusive remedy against the federal government for federal employees injured at work. 5 U.S.C. § 8116 (c). Volunteer workers at Veteran’s Administration hospitals are “employees” for FECA purposes. 5 U.S.C. § 8101 (1)(B); 38 U.S.C. § 513 . FECA would therefore clearly bar an FTCA suit by Lance to recover for the injury he suffered at work. Although Lance isn’t suing for the injury he suffered at work, but for medical malpractice arising out of the injury, this is a distinction without a difference.

When it comes to federal employees, FECA benefits are the only “liability of the United States ... because o/the injury.” 5 U.S.C. § 8116 (c) (emphasis added). As a matter of textual…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.