Alexander

Alexander v. Compton (In re Bonham)

Good Law
2000 Daily Journal DAR 10895·229 F.3d 750·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8193·2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 24799
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 4, 2000Nos. 98-36081, 98-36083, 98-36086, 98-36089, 98-36091, 98-36093, 98-36108, 98-36109, 98-36205 and 99-35046California8,144 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Thomas, J.

We must decide whether a bankruptcy court may order substantive consolidation of two non-debtor corporations, World Plus, Inc. and Atlantic Pacific Funding Corporation, with the bankruptcy estate of Chapter 7 debtor Raejean Bonham nunc pro tunc as of the filing date of the involuntary Chapter 7 petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d), and we reverse the decision of the district court and remand with instructions to affirm the bankruptcy court’s order of nunc pro tunc substantive consolidation.

*759 I

This appeal arises out of a failed Ponzi scheme 1 operated by debtor Raejean Bonham originally through a proprietorship known as “World Plus,” which she eventually incorporated as World Plus, Inc. (‘WPI”), and beginning in 1992, under the name of Atlantic Pacific Funding Corp. (“APFC”), a Nevada corporation. See In re Bonham, 226 B.R. 56, 61-63 (Bankr.D.Alaska 1998). The stated purpose of both WPI and APFC was to purchase frequent flier miles available from various airlines or third parties at a discount and use them to acquire airline tickets, which were then to be sold to the public at a substantial profit. See id.

Bonham was the sole shareholder and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.