Sever

Sever v. National Labor Relations Board

Good Law
231 F.3d 1156·2000 WL 1657162
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 6, 2000Nos. 98-71123, 98-71446California7,346 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sneed, J.

Florian Sever, et al. (the “Employees”) and the Alaska Pulp Corporation (“Alaska Pulp”) have separately petitioned this court to review an order that the National Labor Relations Board (the “NLRB” or the “Board”) issued against Alaska Pulp on August 27, 1998. See Alaska Pulp Corp., 326 NLRB No. 59 , 1998 WL 600786 , at *1 (“Alaska Pulp III”). The order describes how Alaska Pulp is to compensate those employees against whom it committed various unfair labor practices following a strike at one of its facilities in 1986-1987.

The Board has filed a cross-application for enforcement of the order. The Employees have intervened to support the Board’s cross-application to the extent it relates to Alaska Pulp’s petition, and Alaska Pulp has intervened on behalf of the Board against the Employees. Our jurisdiction over these matters is described in Section 10(e) and (f) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended (the “Act”). See 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e), (f).

For the reasons stated herein, we reverse and remand in part, enforce and remand in part, and enforce in part.

I.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

This is a complex case, which makes understanding the procedural and factual history…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.