Tinoqui-Chalola Council of Kitanemuk & Yowlumne Tejon Indians v. United States Department of Energy

Good Law
2000 Daily Journal DAR 12395·232 F.3d 1300·31 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20286·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9280·2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 29509
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 20, 2000No. 99-16384California4,250 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Thompson, J.

The Southwest Center for Biological Diversity and the Sierra Club (collectively “Southwest”) challenge the legality of the *1302 Department of Energy’s (“DOE”) sale of Elk Hills to Occidental Petroleum (“Occidental”). Southwest contends the DOE violated section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq., by refusing to engage in consultation with the Fish & Wildlife Service (“FWS”) prior to completing the sale of Elk Hills and by failing to ensure that the sale would not jeopardize the continued existence of threatened and endangered species. In granting summary judgment in favor of the DOE and Occidental, the district court determined that the completed sale of Elk Hills mooted the controversy. Alternatively, the district court determined that the DOE did not violate section 7 of the ESA.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994). We conclude that the completion of the Elk Hills sale did not moot the controversy between the parties. We further conclude that Congress waived section 7’s consultation requirement as to the DOE’s sale of Elk Hills. See National Defense Authorization Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-106, 110 Stat. 631 (1997). Accordingly, we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.