Smith v. University of Washington

Good Law
233 F.3d 1188
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 4, 2000Nos. 99-35209, 99-35347 and 99-35348California6,587 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fernandez, J.

Katuria Smith, Angela Rock, and Michael Pyle (collectively Smith) brought this action on behalf of themselves and a class of Caucasians and others who were denied admission to the University of Washington Law School. The action was brought against the law school and members of its administration and faculty 2 (collectively the Law School), and in it Smith claimed that the denials of admission had been due to racially discriminatory admissions policies, which violated 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 , 1983, and 2000d. The district court decer-tified a class which had previously been certified under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2), and did not certify a class under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3). 3 The district court also denied Smith a partial summary judgment on the claim that, in general, race cannot be used as a factor in achieving educational diversity, although it may be used for certain limited remedial purposes. Smith appealed, and we affirm.

BACKGROUND

On July 1, 1997, Smith filed suit against the Law School alleging illegal discrimination against Caucasians and others on the basis of their race, which resulted in their being denied admission to the law school. From…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.