Carmen

Carmen v. San Francisco Unified School District

Good Law
2001 Daily Journal DAR 535·237 F.3d 1026·48 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 850·80 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,612·84 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1395
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 16, 2001No. 98-16555California2,611 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kleinfeld, J.

This case turns on summary judgment procedure. The issue is whether a judge must consider materials outside the motion papers and things referred to therein.

Facts

Plaintiff Gwendolyn Carmen holds state certification to teach elementary school. For many years, she worked as a day to day substitute teacher in San Francisco. Though she does not speak, read or write Chinese, she worked as a long-term substitute teacher in a fifth grade Chinese bilingual class during the 1991-92 school year. She had a Chinese-speaking teacher’s aide.

Carmen lost the long-term substitute Chinese bilingual job for the 1992-93 school year to Eleanor Chan. Both Chan and Carmen lacked bilingual education certificates, but Chan spoke Chinese. Carmen sued the school district, claiming that she was discriminated against in this appointment because she is Black. 2 The *1028 district court granted summary judgment against her.

Carmen made another claim-one of more substance than her claim that the school district discriminated against her because she was Black by hiring someone who could speak Chinese to teach a Chinese bilingual class. The more substantive claim is that the school district retaliated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.