Acuna v. Justices of Supreme Court of State of Cal.

70 F.3d 1277 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Peter A. ACUNA, Attorney, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JUSTICES OF the SUPREME COURT OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA; CHIEF JUSTICE MALCOLM LUCAS; ASSOCIATE JUSTICES KATHRYN MICKLE WERDEGAR; STANLEY MOSK; JOYCE KENNARD; ARMAND ARABIAN; MARVIN BAXTER; RONALD GEORGE, Associate Justices of Supreme court of the State of California; DANIEL EL LUNGREN, Attorney General for the State of California; THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA; STATE BAR COURT; LISE PERLMAN; ELLEN PECK; CARLOS VELARDE; JENNIFER GEE; STUART WOO; DAVID CARR; TERRY R. VACCARO; ALAN K. GOLDHAMMER; The State Bar Court for the State of California; CYDNEY BATCHELOR, Esq., Deputy Trial Counsel of the State Bar of California, officially and personally, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55499. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 20, 1995. * Decided Nov. 22, 1995. Before: PREGERSON, NORRIS and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Attorney Peter…