Kailash C. Chaudhary v. Richard O'Neil Deborah Swanson

70 F.3d 1277 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kailash C. CHAUDHARY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard O'NEIL; Deborah Swanson, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15408. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 16, 1995. * Decided Nov. 30, 1995. Before: SNEED, SKOPIL, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Kailash Chandra Chaudhary, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d) of his civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 . Chaudhary contends that the district court erred in concluding that he (1) lacked standing to bring claims on behalf of his daughter because he had relinquished his parental rights and his daughter had been legally adopted; and (2) failed to state a cognizable claim of violation of his procedural due process rights in relation to the termination of his parental rights in a state court proceeding. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and we…