Barrett v. H.S. Weavers (Underwriting) Agencies Ltd.

70 F.3d 1277 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edmont T. BARRETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. H.S. WEAVERS (UNDERWRITING) AGENCIES LTD.; Walbrook Insurance Company Ltd.; Anglo American Insurance Company Ltd.; Dearborn Insurance Company; and Assicurazioni Generali Spa. London Branch, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55364. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 16, 1995. * Decided Nov. 29, 1995. 1 Before: HALL and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and PRO ** , District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Edmont T. Barrett appeals a decision granting summary judgment in favor of providers of legal malpractice insurance (the "Insurers") who declined to defend a claim against him. Barrett claims that the insurance policy is ambiguous, requiring Insurers to defend him and that the district court erred in not considering the declaration of expert David E. Isselhard. We disagree and AFFIRM the grant of summary judgment. BACKGROUND 4 From November 10, 1986, until February…