Chesney v. Seifert

70 F.3d 1277 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert Leroy CHESNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W. SEIFERT, Warden; William P. Barr, Attorney General; R.L. Matthews; Mark A. Henry; Larry F. Taylor, Warden; J.D. Swinson, Warden; Todd R. Craig; Carl Sparks, Sheriff; David Laventhol; George Wilkinson; Sam Samples; C.R. Edwards; C.A. Turnbo; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55756. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 20, 1995. * Decided Nov. 22, 1995. Before: PREGERSON, NORRIS, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Former federal prisoner Robert L. Chesney appeals pro se from the district court's dismissal of his action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), alleging violation of the civil rights of deaf inmates. The district court dismissed the action with prejudice after Chesney failed to file a third amended complaint within the…