Admiral Ins. Co. v. Rushmore

70 F.3d 1277 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stephen RUSHMORE; Hospitality Valuation Services, Inc., a New York corporation; Bruce D. Greenberg, Alayne Greenberg; Michael P. McCalley; Shirley McCalley; Greenberg, Campbell, Chin & Associates, a partnership; Dan W. Mahoney, Susan Mahoney; Mahoney, Cole & Associates, a partnership; Michael J. Naifeh; Bonny Naifeh, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15244. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 13, 1995. * Decided Nov. 21, 1995. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, No. CV-89-00280-JET; Jack E. Tanner, District Judge, Presiding. D.Ariz. REVERSED AND REMANDED. Before: HALL, KOZINSKI and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Admiral Insurance Co. ("Admiral") appeals the dismissal of its complaint against Steven Rushmore and Hospitality Services, Inc. (collectively "HVS").…